Current:Home > MyMaryland’s highest court ending ban on broadcasting audio recordings -OceanicInvest
Maryland’s highest court ending ban on broadcasting audio recordings
View
Date:2025-04-12 22:07:53
ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — A ban on broadcasting court audio recordings in Maryland will end Jan. 1, after the state’s highest court approved new rules regarding the release of court recordings.
The Maryland Supreme Court approved the change during a meeting Tuesday.
The Daily Record reports that starting next year, the public will be able to obtain copies of audio recordings and disseminate or broadcast them, though the recordings will first be subject to a redaction process to shield sensitive information.
Retired Judge Alan Wilner, who chairs Maryland’s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, said the committee aimed to provide public access to audio recordings while also safeguarding vulnerable witnesses and victims of crime.
When the change takes effect, a judge would be required to find there is “clear and convincing evidence” that there is a compelling reason for a redaction. That could include reasons such as protecting a vulnerable witness or a defendant’s right to a fair trial, and that “no substantial harm” will be caused by the redaction.
The redaction would only apply to copies of the audio recording that are given out to the public. Members of the public could still listen to the complete recording upon request by coming to court in person, but they would not be able to keep or broadcast the unredacted version.
The redactions should be “as narrow as practicable in scope and duration to effectuate the interest sought to be protected, according to the proposal approved by the court.
The Maryland court changed the rule, which was known as the “broadcast ban,” after a federal court last year ruled that it was unconstitutional to prohibit the broadcast of legally obtained recordings of court hearings.
veryGood! (512)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- A Kansas woman died in an apartment fire. Her family blames the 911 dispatch center’s mistakes
- Largest US publisher, bestselling authors sue over Iowa book ban
- Katie Ledecky loses a home 400-meter freestyle race for the first time in 11 years
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Madagascar’s top court ratifies president’s reelection in vote boycotted by opposition
- US proposes plan to protect the snow-dependent Canada lynx before warming shrinks its habitat
- Hot Holiday Party Dresses Under $100 From H&M, Anthropologie & More
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Traumatized by war, fleeing to US: Jewish day schools take in hundreds of Israeli students
Ranking
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- More than 30 people are trapped under rubble after collapse at a mine in Zambia, minister says
- Anya Taylor-Joy, Chris Hemsworth battle in 'Mad Max' prequel 'Furiosa' trailer: Watch
- California sheriff’s sergeant recovering after exchanging gunfire with suspect who was killed
- Trump's 'stop
- Registration open for interactive Taylor Swift experience by Apple Music
- Amanda Knox Gives Birth, Welcomes Baby No. 2 With Husband Christopher Robinson
- Pentagon forges new high-tech agreement with Australia, United Kingdom, aimed at countering China
Recommendation
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
Pet wolf hybrid attacks, kills 3-month old baby in Alabama
Blue over ‘G0BLUE': University of Michigan grad sues after losing license plate
2 Nevada State Troopers killed in hit-and-run while helping motorist on Las Vegas freeway, authorities say
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Ya Filthy Animals Will Love Macaulay Culkin and Catherine O’Hara’s Home Alone Reunion
Endless shrimp and other indicators
Has COP28 President Sultan al-Jaber Used the UN Climate Summit to Advance the Interests of UAE’s Oil Company?